Degreasing Agent Chemical Name

Reform of Justice "between light and shadow. On the judiciary as

This is one of the greatest and most urgent reforms that our country needs. It can not be waived, although there are also other pressing needs. The text presented by the Minister Angie Alfano is not - one needs to be objective - or read a text "ad personam", perhaps as pure and useless polemic someone wanted to support arbitrarily. It 's a text broadly positive innovation, the appropriate sentence for the scrutiny of parliament. It 's a project that in itself is confronted with the first reality that every project has to confront: the views of citizens and the Chambers. It 's a project that is proposed with light and shadow. First the lights: the expected responsibilities of the judiciary, and the finality of the proceedings at first instance in case of acquittal, and the impartiality of the judge compared to a national prosecutor and judge. There are lights, but many hidden shadows. The first point reflects what most people perceive as a serious structural weakness of our system, as demonstrated by the outcome of the referendum on the matter. It is still below what should be the reception of European directives in this regard. The second protection is true - and it was essential - for the sacred right of the citizen not to be tried "for life", especially if innocent, justice, but, in light of the chronicles fails to protect justice. It has been seen that often, after many years, thanks to new technology, it was possible to conclusively prove the guilt of the acquitted. The rule should therefore be integrated, as in other systems that adopt, with a directive that permits, in the presence of new and crucial material evidence to reopen the case and therefore the trial. With regard to the impartiality of judges than the prosecutor, the principle is valid in itself, even a duty, but can not be expected to make an absolute point of wanting to be even two MSCs, one prosecutor and one for the judiciary that judges , which it inevitably often lead to a situation of conflict rather than opens the synergy between different skills. It would obviously be just an organ for the trial courts that the prosecutor, but both subject to a CSM whose members come from, in addition to those appointed by parliament, equally by both courts. Finally, missing a key point for the renewal of the legal system as a whole, a point to which we are unfortunately still bound to fully governed directly or indirectly descended from the "Code Rocco" fascistic memory, one concerning the equal subjection to the law of both the citizens, as members of law enforcement and public officials. Today the city is located here done - almost always - in a situational which is that of subjection to arbitrary personnel, irrespective of the law. It would also be a duty here a discipline and a call to responsibility as a reason for the judges.
francesco Latteri Scholten. (03/18/2011)

Communication Board For Stroke Adult

sexuality: the left more and more Victorian than the alien and alienating their historical positions and their values.

Subject Montesquieu and his "L'esprit des Lois", subject also its reception by the ns Constitution, except then the independence of the judiciary, however, should be made clear that it is a position of judges, above and beyond the law. Why independence there must be, like no depth to the magistrate, as well as the judiciary, the powers to third parties, including much of the judiciary as an apolitical judiciary and the Constitutional Court. The lack of this fact creates a short circuit of the system itself: the "Directory" of the courts of Robespierre and Saint Just painful memories, the times and the darkest dark of the "Revolution." In order to guarantee the fairness of the system, which already aspired Montesquieu, is also required separation, starting career, including investigating magistrate, which is entitled to the investigation, and judge, which is responsible for conducting a fair trial and therefore devoid by Guest or injuries that may be acquired in the previous phase. In particular, after "clean hands" (and were not clean, because dirty shit and blood) is not only right but the duty to "reasonable suspicion" because as Cusani was already noted, he had noticed that intreresseva, rather than the 'acquisition and stripped of certain mechanisms in toto, to arrive at certain things and that's it. But this is no longer justice. And the much-celebrated "clean hands" with its "notice of" exhibited as evidence of guilt (and often used for political purposes, as in the case of Berlusconi in 1994), with its preventive detention, with his suicide and excellent (and not in jail), "Justice" certainly was not and "apolitical" less than ever. E 'was instead a well-orchestrated action policy pursued by the judiciary. The end of (successful): beheaded an entire political class, but this subversion is beautiful and good. And 'failed politically because in the meantime, however, another policy had elected leaders who was not that of the courts and therefore has also been attacked. This is extremely serious and inadmissible. Precisely for this reason it is also necessary that the magistrate as an individual, such as the judiciary as such, are required to respond to the law and accountable, to assume their responsibilities. In a word also be subject to the law and not above it. Points are guaranteed by all democracies, and which is listed below and ordered from Europe. These are points that our legal system, unfortunately, has no factual grounds are bound, as well as for much of the code, by the "Rocco" and other regulations of the former fascist state law ever put into decay or annulment of legislation. In other words, it is fascist rules, created by the fascist state that you do not understand how it can be left to the right not to want to overcome to adapt not only to European positions, but also to a more authentic reality of fairness to all as was the times of "L'esprit des Lois" it was expected. It is not clear why a left remains anchored, as the issue of sexuality radically right-wing positions and that the old Left, both European and Italian too, has always opposed and fought.

francesco Latteri Scholten (07/03/2011).

Gay Cruising In Baltimore

Soaring price of grain and cereals (+70%) among the main causes of the crisis in North Africa.

The cost of wheat and cereals has soared by 70% over the same period a year ago. Only last month the rise in the cost of wheat was 3.7%. E 'reveals what the last FAO report. Overproduction by Argentina, China and Ethiopia have fortunately overcome at least in part to two opposing factors: 1) to lower production in Russia because of the extensive fires of last summer and the increasing conversion of large areas in the U.S. manufacturing production ethanol and biofuels, and 2) increased consumption by China and India. This has been a slight majority of consumption with respect to availability as early as 2010: 2010 production = 2.229 million tons, consumption = 2260; 2011: 2237 = production, consumption = 2278. The result was that by taking the value 100 = average cost of cereals in the period 2002/2004, the average cost January 2011 = 245 and appears to be in February 2011 = 254 against 121, 167, 2006 and 2007. FAO data also show a substantial balance and a very strong convergence - an almost perfect coincidence you might say - between supply and demand, although since 2010 there has been a very small majority against a majority demand for supply of previous years. The 70% increase in one year - as indeed gl'aumenti previous years older - so can not quite find their purpose and their plausibility in a productive and therefore necessarily refer to severe criminal and vicious speculation. The impact of these increases are totally unjustified and illegitimate, of course inversely proportional to the wealth of the country that has been very strong in North African countries characterized by a very low GDP per capita: $ 3800 Algeria, Egypt 2760, Morocco 3000, Tunisia 4250. Better from this point of view the situation in Libya with $ 6510. I give guideline values \u200b\u200bas compared to those of Malta (about $ 13,000) and Italy (just under 20000). Should be added here some basic economic considerations, already made by Adam Smith and later denied ever: "In any stage of society, at every stage of progress, the grain is the product of human activity. (...) As a result, the grain is, in every different stage of wealth and progress; a more accurate measure of value than any other commodity or group of products. (...) In addition, the grain is in each country the main source of livelihood of the worker. "(" The Wealth of Nations "pag.201 Newton Compton 1995)." The price of corn regulates the price of domestic products all the others. It regulates the money price of labor, which must always be such as to enable the employee to purchase a quantity of corn sufficient to maintain himself and his family as generous, modest or poor in the situation of progress, stationary or recourse obligation of society to keep those who use it. It regulates the money price of all other components of the crude product of the earth and (...) so that the materials of almost all manufactures. By regulating the money price of labor, regulates the price of fine art and productive activities. And regulate these, it regulates the price of the finished manufacture. The money price of labor, and anything that is the product of land or labor, must necessarily increase or decrease in relation to the cash price of wheat . "(Ibid., p.. 432). In light of these considerations is easy to imagine what it means and leading to an increase in the cost of wheat by 70% in just one year in countries such as North Africa where the per capita income is around a few hundred dollars a month.

francesco Latteri Scholten (04/03/2011)

Removing Stitching From Football Jerseys

North Africa as Apocalypse Now, "to reach Colonel Kurtz and terminate his command."

" Saigon ... Shit ... I'm still only Saigon! ... "Saigon, but it could be Rabat, Tunis, Algiers, Cairo, or - more likely than not - Tripoli. " I watched a snail crawling on the edge of a razor, slowly crawling on the edge ... slowly ... and, to survive. It 's a dream, a nightmare that I do ... But we have to kill them recurrently, we reduce them to ashes. ... Pig after pig village after village ... Army after army. ... Then they say that I am a murderess ... How do you say when the assassins accuse a murderess? They lie! They lie. And we must be lenient with those who lie. I hate them with those nabobs. I hate them deeply. " see Willard, Colonel Kurtz was one of the best men we had. He was also a good man. But ... At one point his ideas ... His methods ... They have become insane. Insane. Now it has been established in Cambodia - but it could very well be the Libya - where he is in command of an army of Montagnards who fear him and venerate him as a God You see, Willard, in this war, as it were, things get confused, power, ideals, good, evil ... But there, among the natives ... You may be tempted to believe God ... " And I got to do what? " You see, you have to reach Colonel Kurtz and ... Terminate his command ... " Ending? " Ending. "It 's one of the most famous dialogues of" Cult "film of the 80s: Apocalypse Now. E' characterized by difficulty, from the anxiety, uncertainty, especially from the discomfort of exposing the lies, deceit, hypocrisy of 'West, wholly implicit in the contradictory mission: to end the command of one of his best men, who was also a good man, but which is now discovered as a bloodthirsty crowd. Now it is perverted, then the West can no longer keep to their service, because the West is good. For this very reason, however, it can not be accountable for their crimes. When these come out so must be attributed to his puppets, and these turned into scapegoats in which justice is restored "justice" and - most importantly - the "goodness" of the West. It 'something that must be made in full regalia, with large clacche beats and drums, because it serves also to turn to lie, to hide. To hide the evidence, to deny it. What would be if you placed the most obvious questions, but these Until yesterday they were "even" men "good", on behalf of those who were where they were doing what they were doing?

francesco Latteri Scholten.

The Letter From Friend For I 130

North Africa: the dirty hands of the West. The shadow of the corpse of Enrico Mattei.

North Africa burns. Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria, Egypt and now Libya. We all talk about riots, shows us the pictures, always bloody. Someone starts talking about the ferocity of dictatorships and dictators who reign there. Someone else begins to point out that Obama, unlike European countries, has for some time a greater distance from them and closer proximity to those who are, today, the factions in revolt. That's it, nothing else. Nobody dares to go beyond that. All are careful to protect the image of "clean boy 'of the West. No one speaks of the case even closer to these motions, the fires this summer have largely destroyed the crops of wheat to Russia, the granary of the world, especially after large areas of the United States were allocated to different production: genetically modified corn for oils and fuels. Other cause, which is located immediately behind, is the policy of robberies in the food industry that are hidden behind these, with their speculation that literally puts on his knees Whole countries and geographical areas of the globe, such as Northern Africa. Although none of these say anything. He hides the unfair nature of the post hard Western colonialism. It is, inter alia, of this beautiful discovery: if you go to colonize a country we have the image of the oppressor, the exploiter, the bad words and more must provide at least in part to the infrastructure of that country; but if it is free you have the image of the liberator, the good, the infrastructure if they want if they pay and the exploitation of our corporations do even better and more, and the oppression they make instead of their dictators. Multinationals at work in North Africa are mostly French and English but also Italian, including ENI and IMPREGILO. In the past, after the fall of the Algerian regime, for example, lay the struggle between the French ELF el 'ENI. E 'in this context that should be located - according to several leading experts - including the sabotage of the bioreactor Morane Saulnier ENI' s on which the 19 of October 27, 1962 at Bescapé died the same Enrico Mattei, "a ruthless moralist, a immortal corrupter, a provider of upright bribes, a manager who did not want to be at the service of the Palace, but put the building to its service. A businessman from the state with a touch of European style Peronism, or Gaullism to South America. " (Indro Montanelli, Italy of the twentieth century). Yesterday as now, the crisis is theirs, their schemes are, dictators are their oppressors, the riots are theirs. Today more than ever we have nothing to do. That the various and many journalists, intellectuals and journalists living populists are keen to emphasize: we are chaste and pure. "What we care about your purity, my little boy, how much you're afraid to get your hands dirty. Eh, well, it remains pure. What use is because it is in our midst? Purity is an idea of \u200b\u200bmonks and fakirs. You people, intellectuals, bourgeois gl'anarchici, you draw them the excuse to do nothing. Do nothing, stand still, tighten your elbows on the body, wear gloves. I, my hands are dirty. Up to the elbows. I immersed in shit and blood "(Jean Paul Sartre, Dirty Hands).

francesco Latteri Scholten.

Parts Forharris Boats

The real "crime" of Berlusconi, that it can not be tried: he had "stolen" votes and the "feudal" lords of the former policy of "first republic". For this since their judges haunt him.

Sometimes, as in this case, it may be necessary to devote a short space for the delineation of the contexts of the scenarios in which historical events are located, especially if they are, as in our case, often overlooked. In the absence of what one can not be able to understand events and their scope. Like the rest of fact it is not been, with few exceptions, the Italian political class of that time: the class politics of the times of the end of the "first republic". These are scenarios where it is located in the entry policy of Silvio Berlusconi. So they can not be ignored. The Italian Constitution was adopted on December 22, 1947, shall enter into force on 1 January 1948. Officially it is the result of the victorious war of liberation from fascism. In reality the 'Italy had to pay war damages - and the world began - never saw that the winners pay for the damage of war. Even today we have American military bases in Italy and the Italian military bases in America, to confirm as soon as possible. The truth So it is true that the war we lost, that our country is a country with limited sovereignty and, as such order is within the context set out in Yalta. The "first republic", like it or not, it is also and above all, the daughter of Yalta. Significantly, 12 May 1947, the Communists and the Socialists ousted from government 21 June De Gasperi loses a confidence vote in the Constituent Assembly with the votes of Democrats, liberals, monarchists and whatever. On March 16, 1978 Aldo Moro, whose policy - like that of Enrico Berlinguer, whose life is an attempt on a trip to Eastern Europe - was challenging in that order, is kidnapped by a commando of the "Red Brigades". So that balance, ie the "first republic" is, in Italy, finished politically. There is, however, Yalta, the framework within which it occurs and who must remain on our country. E 'meaningful about the affirmation of Michele Placido in "Crime Novel", the film version of the novel historical reconstruction of the events of the Magliana gang: "... the fact is that until there is a wall in Berlin here in Italy, should not change anything. " E 'stood as two years later, August 2, 1980, the Bologna massacre with 85 dead and hundreds injured. So while we have the corpse of the "first republic" in its advanced state of decomposition and putrefaction in world events occur that change the "framework". I will mention just a few: October 16, 1978, Karol Wojtyla was elected Pope; March 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev became secretary of the CPSU, January 16, 1989, John Paul II received the members of the Soviet Committee for Peace Borovich, Gubarev and Grechko, November 9, 1989 , fall of the Berlin Wall, December 1, 1989, John Paul II receives Mikhail Gorbachev, June 12, 1990, proclamation of independence of Russia from the USSR, December 25, 1991, Gorbachev leaves the Kremlin, April 17, 1992 is proclaimed as Russia or the Russian Federation . And 'this, for very brief, the context, the context in which location is the "first republic" and its end. A framework is almost always ignored by almost all of the political class it and the ignorance of which has been instrumental in developing the same happens to him. It is also an ignorance due to a mentality unfavorable, unable to move beyond the myopia of the "give me the cold war is over" because "so much to us of these events, in our house, what do we care?" Many have seen angrily the reunification of Germany, some more enlightened, we saw the broadening of our largest export market. Virtually no one has been able to figure out what the collapse of the Yalta meant for the internal order of our country. Some eagle has come to understand that he was now very simplistically failed a reference to ideological and political but also economic for PCI. Also in the same PCI, hence the campaign of "renewal". Virtually none of the Italian politicians, especially those corrupt and more corrupt, he understood what they could mean for their corruption. "That has to do with the bribes Yalta? I'm in the bribery Prenn by the Italian in Italy, that I care de Yalta?" Does this: that now, unlike in the past, the Americans can not care less to be a waste of time, men, equipment, and, above all, money to cover your junk. It means this: that now, for this, they will come out crap. And it is in fact what happens on time. And, the parallelism between the end of Yalta and the total collapse now rotting corpse of the "first republic" is chilling, it shows only some of the most sensational events with dates: March 2, 1989 Opening maxi trial of 235 Red Brigades, February 17, 1992, arrest Mario Chiesa, Clean Hands, May 23, 1992 , Capaci massacre, May 25, 1992, President Scalfaro, July 19, 1992, massacre via d'Amelio, September 6, 1992, arrested Giuseppe Madonia, 15 January 1993, arrested Salvatore Riina, July 3, 1993, killed himself in prison, Gabriele Cagliari, President of ENI, 6 July 1993, it kills the Montedison Raul Gardini. E 'in this moment of total collapse of the rotten corpse inverminito the "first republic" and its "Lord feudal policy ", which is to accommodate the entry into politics of a young entrepreneur rampant, unrecognized by the majority of Italians, whose proposal to take the field made a few years earlier than the" feudal lords policies "caused the hilarity. Now However, the history, those who laughed at first, he had thrown in the shit of their true reality, first, and then deleted. Again, the coincidence of dates is sensational: 26 January 1994, Berlusconi founded Forza Italy, 27, 28 March 1994 victory of the "Polo" in the elections: Berlusconi has won the votes and the "estates" of the old "feudal lords policies." Without the collapse of the Yalta and political myopia about it, the old political class, in politics, in Italy, could never do anything. For this reason, in the eyes of some old Italy, Berlusconi has always been a usurper, a profiteer of the accident. " And 'this is the real charge that he is always moved, but this is impossible to accuse him, let alone process it. But there's more: the collapse of the old "feudal lords policies" laid bare as dreadful plots celassero behind the screen of their respectability, their purism, their morality, often, alas, also involving large parts of the Church itself. The fierce and monstrous hypocrisy of respectability and moral purist of that system. E 'from here comes the bestial fury against alleged vicissitudes private life of the Prime Minister that if he were any other private citizen, including some prelate, could not give a care less to none. You will - into a frenzy of madness - to reaffirm their moral superiority to the looting and delegitimize leggittimizzarsi to go: take back what has always considered its own: namely that, however, was and and 'Italian.

francesco Latteri Scholten.

Ski Boot Calf Pressure

Politicians are elected by citizens, not judges.

La ns. Constitution adopts the principle of separation of powers, as with all modern democracies. It 's a concept postulated back in 1748 by Montesquieu in his L'esprit des lois. " All modern legal systems of the postulate as a guarantee of democracy. It postulates that is a distinction between political power - the executive and legislative - and judicial branches. You should ensure that the "Kratos (power) of the" Demos "(the people). To this end, the people elect their representatives, shall exercise their will and give their own laws. The court instead simply a technician who is chosen for ability and competence and that puts them in the service of popular will and its laws, that of political power, the executive (government) As the legislative (parliament). The system that is apolitical claims the court. The downside of this negates the 'Demos Kratos' is because it puts a political actor is not elected by the Demos because it denies the "Demos" a political act. It goes to court to invalidate the political will and counter attested by the elections. The system, in principle, has worked well in many countries. In principle, even in Italy. By the end of the so-called "First Republic", ie with the murder of Aldo Moro, 9 May 1978, instead beginning an institutional clash again today in full force. In it a strong element was the incremental collapse of Yalta with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. The first outcome of this clash was certainly "Tangentopoli." It is also included in it the mutation of reality Masonic and organized crime in the new scenarios, and then the mutation of the relationship of these with the State. In particular, just the brutal murder of Giovanni Falcone, 23 May 1992, brings two days later, at the election of a magistrate as President of the Republic Oscar Luigi Scalfaro. On November 9, 1997 instead of a magistrates Excellent "Clean Hands", Antonio Di Pietro is elected in the constituency of Mugello with the "olive tree", then build the "Italy of Values" which also adhere eg. De Magistris. It 's true that, to date, there is no party of the judges, but it is also true that what we perceive is that it is as if there were. There is a particularly moralistic Puritans in which echoes loudly "penitentiae act" of the friars of medieval Bogomil memory, with their heroic autofustigazioni bare-chested in the public square in the middle of snowstorm. A morality that is far from the achievements of our company. Constitution, which prohibits discrimination on the right to sexual motivations. And 'how much moralism Bogomil calls recently to all heading, leading to demand that for reasons of a sexual nature is depriving a citizen of civil rights. A purist who brutalizes, rejecting the past and in the burning of his memory.
francesco Latteri Scholten.

Wendy Calio Engagement

rampant Against purism: 1968, Meilleur. The crap that was there before, among others, two high-profile cases: Maria Montessori and Padre Pio.

There is a very significant scene in the beginning of a recent film about the great figure of Maria Montessori. It incorporates in a synthetic way to one of the many small (but significativissime) historical events in the life of the educator. The young Mary is now already a university student of medicine, between one thousand and one woman is discriminatory because purists and "therefore" inferior. " Among his tasks also take care of that sad vision of the corpses of their study and their dissection for anatomical pathology. He touches it to bother about the deceased a beautiful young woman died of syphilis. The physical traces of evil are indisconoscibili on the body. At that time there was already the "Wassermann", the young would therefore have been treated and saved. But it was not. Why? Why, because he was neither a fool nor an ignoramus, if your doctor had prescribed the medication, she would understand. Understand what? Her husband, both officially good, was a regular visitor to brothels. "I mean, it was decided to sacrifice his life in protection of social appearances of her husband," is the text comment to the story of Maria Montessori. Here is the Victorian purism in its concrete reality: what was there before. Still, staying at Montessori, Maria, for that purism is a "whore" and his family is a family of libertines. Not because Maria hosts the "profession", not because it is an "easy", but simply because it claims to be her scandalous to choose, to decide who possibly could be the 'man of her life. In Foggia the other hand, there is a sconosciutissimo simple and humble friar who took the name Pius, who carries just the ease of your work brother. Celebrating the sacraments, instructing the spiritual life. Is there anything wrong with that? Sure. There are small and rural gl'ambienti that people see and speak. It says exactly what he sees: that the friar does this and nothing else. Unlike the Bishop of Foggia and several other priests who are frequent visitors to brothels and prostitutes. Because people know that too and also speaks of this, consistently turns in preference to the friar and his brothers, which they acquire, involuntarily, a greater reputation and authority of all do not like. Here then basted stories of women - of course by those who knew them very well, in the biblical sense - the persecution, of course, in the name of moral purism, naturally, the Bishop of Foggia defends a sword. In the name of purism also the summary trials behind closed doors of course, without any real possibbili defense, even with the wealth of guilt in order to restore the carp "majesty" of the bishop. The truth, fortunately, even after many vicissitudes and many years in the case of S. Pius won. In the case of the young woman whose body was discussion by Maria Montessori did not. They went forward instead ideas, and the new training method. They spread all over the world. In many and most parties had already started work not simply of human reality, but also the social reality of Western man, in its concreteness. And even his morals. Many people had begun to denounce the brutal ferocity, especially its moral purist, that was precisely shape of it. He did Karl Marx, had made him more heavily, because of regard to the psycho social and cultural reality Friedrich Nietzsche. Freud, with his studies in those years, gave technical support to the Nietzschean concept. In France, began to make their contributions many young intellectuals, including gl'altri: Raymond Aron, Nizan, Jean Paul Sartre and his partner Simone de Beav. Even in Germany, however, Edith Stein, aka Santa Teresa Benedicta of the Cross, will pursue concepts in several respects very similar to those of Maria Montessori. But purism, which is on the socio political fascism, had already begun to envelop Europe and the world in darkness which will culminate on the night of the Second World War. At the end of the night, the survivors - Edith Stein died at Auschwitz, Sartre fail with a loophole to escape from Stalag XII - will resume their work. New recruits will join, among them eg. the great Michel Foucault. Their motto is to Sartre, what inspires their philosophy: "Freedom and Responsibility". It 'true that the motto that inspired the late' Sixties. The moral is a moral impossibly abstract because it corresponds to consciousness without an object. But consciousness is always - as Husserl taught - awareness of something, then there is the ontological possibility of a consciousness without an object. Consciousness and the world stand together and consciousness is always in the situation. Therefore, any builds situation awareness and at the same time, gives rise to a moral. Morality arises from individual social practices, it is facticity. His generosity is the supreme value, which is, historically, acceptance of the deviation of the individual project, on the interpersonal level is instead save the ontological facticity of the other: To love is to accept the reality of the other less significant, its finitude quota and at the same time his own. "The morale is so permanent conversion in the sense of Trotsky, Permanent Revolution" (Sartre, Cahiers pour une morale). But there is no true conversion yourself if there is no conversion historic conversion world. And 'this true conversion, that it is "discovered that the only valid plan is to do (and not to be) and that the project can not be done without falling into the abstract universal. So the good project is to act on a specific situation and to change "(ibid.). "The truth is not real unless it is lived and made it" (Sartre, Verité et Existence). Here are the principles of Sixty, the core of his moral. Are the criteria that Raymond Aron, Jean Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, Michel Foucault and many others will lead to the streets in person, alongside the Renault workers, their students from the Sorbonne and the Collège de France and many others, especially people common. The Dawn and his moral philosophy, against the purism, its society, its culture and its morality: the morality of the Night. The darkest night and based humanity. Against the Night and darkness, the darkness and the darkness: the Aurora Viva, Viva sixty-eight.

francesco Latteri Scholten.